David Okereke

Cremonese · Forward · Nigeria · 400 min

Ballity Verdict

What makes this player special?

Confidence · low

David Okereke earns his standing through how he shapes phases of play for Cremonese — not through a single viral trait.

On the pitch he has actually been used as CF (#9) / LW. That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Okereke's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.

The trade-off is real: physicality shows up as a structural caveat in the profile. Any club buying the upside has to decide whether that hole is tolerable in their system — or whether they will need complementary players beside him.

Why Ballity says this

  • Shown minutes: CF (#9) / LW
  • Known caveat: physicality
Receipts
  • · Player Profile
  • · Role Breadth
  • · Deployment authenticity
  • · Sample · limited

Position

Wide Forward

Appearances

10

Great+ roles

0

Age

28

Preferred foot

Height

182 cm

Ballity insights

Peer context vs wingers — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).

Usage rate

Share of team touches (non-GK) among wingers with match data.

8.8% team touches

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

14.7%

Also 38.0 touches/90 (season aggregate).

Efficiency

Output quality per action for wingers.

25 score

Peer band · Average

Pool percentile

50.0%

xA per key pass 0.061v1 win rate 50Cross accuracy 20

On-ball separation

Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.

39 score

Peer band · Average

Pool percentile

59.8%

1v1 win % 50Adv touchline % 24Wide channel (self-created) % 0Unblocked (self-created) % 75Shadow zone (self-created) % 75Fast break (self-created) % 0Half-space % 26.6

Off-ball separation

Movement-created space on assisted attempts.

46 score

Peer band · Average

Pool percentile

64.8%

Unblocked (assisted) % 100Shadow zone (assisted) % 50Arrival zone (assisted) % 50Wide channel (assisted) % 0xG per assisted shot 0.1

Balance & structural weaknesses

How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.

How we define this

Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.

Weak routesWinger

Strong as Physicality (Great)

Weak routes

DuelistCreator · Average

Defensive contribution

Proxy only · confidence: proxynot a role tier

Does not clear

Proxy p2 · Actions p6 within winger peers

Stat profile

Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).

Duels 71Tempo 56Defending 49
Creation15
Ball Progressor8
Carrying48
Finishing25
Defending49
Duels71
Tempo56
Box threat39

Versatility Index

Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.

3 groups · 5 roles
39/ 100

Index

39.2

Breadth 26.8 · Depth 12.4

FullbacksCentre-backsMidfielders · GreatWingers · GreatForwards · Good
  • ·Midfielders: Box Crasher (Great), Carrier (Good)
  • ·Wingers: Raumdeuter (Great)
  • ·Forwards: Poacher (Good), Target Man (Good)

Versatility shape

Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.

Unclassified

Unclassified

Unclassified
0

Distinct Great+

0 Great+ roles total

Where he plays

Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.

Natural

CFCFTarget Man
LWLWRaumdeuter

Role translations

Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.

NaturalValidatedSupportedStrongPlausibleExploratory

Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.

Role-by-role detail

How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.

Similar players

Shape match across winger roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.

© 2026 Ballity · Player Profiling