Adam Armstrong
Wolverhampton · Forward · England · 1,146 min
Ballity Verdict
What makes this player special?
Adam Armstrong's value is deciding games where it hurts: occupation of the box, finishing, and the pressure that comes with a centre-forward who stays dangerous. Build-up help is secondary; the point is goals and presence.
He is not trying to be everything. The profile is concentrated: do poacher at a high level, and let secondary tasks stay secondary.
On the pitch he has actually been used as CF (#9). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Armstrong's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.
There are no major weakness flags screaming from the current profile — which does not mean he is complete, only that the main story is the strength of what he already does.
Why Ballity says this
- Clearest current facet: poacher (good)
- Shown minutes: CF (#9)
- No major weakness flags in the current profile
Receipts
- · Player Profile
- · Role Breadth
- · Deployment authenticity
- · Sample · featured
Position
Forward
Appearances
14
Great+ roles
0
Age
29
Preferred foot
Right
Height
172 cm
Ballity insights
Peer context vs forwards — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).
Usage rate
Share of team touches (non-GK) among forwards with match data.
4.7% team touches
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
26.6%
Also 22.1 touches/90 (season aggregate).
Efficiency
Output quality per action for forwards.
42 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
39.8%
On-ball separation
Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.
33 score
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
76.9%
Off-ball separation
Movement-created space on assisted attempts.
65 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
32.4%
Balance & structural weaknesses
How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.
How we define this
Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.
No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.
Stat profile
Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).
Versatility Index
Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.
Index
28.4
Breadth 20.1 · Depth 8.3
- ·Midfielders: Box Crasher (Elite), Carrier (Good)
- ·Forwards: Poacher (Good)
Versatility shape
Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.
Unclassified
UnclassifiedDistinct Great+
0 Great+ roles total
Where he plays
Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.
Natural
Role translations
Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.
Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.
Role-by-role detail
How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.
Similar players
Shape match across forward roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.
Viktor Gyökeres
Arsenal · PL 25/26
Closest roles
PoacherΔ29
Target ManΔ36
Shadow StrikerΔ39
Santiago Giménez
Milan · Serie A
Closest roles
- PoacherΔ1
- Target ManΔ1
- Shadow StrikerΔ0
Santiago Castro
Bologna · Serie A 24/25
Closest roles
- PoacherΔ16
- Target ManΔ19
- Shadow StrikerΔ7