Budu Zivzivadze
1. FC Heidenheim · Forward · Georgia · 1,146 min
Ballity Verdict
What makes this player special?
Budu Zivzivadze's value is deciding games where it hurts: occupation of the box, finishing, and the pressure that comes with a centre-forward who stays dangerous. Build-up help is secondary; the point is goals and presence.
Beyond the headline job, Zivzivadze remains plausible as shadow striker and target man. The secondary roles matter for how a coach can reorganise without changing the XI entirely.
On the pitch he has actually been used as CF (#9). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Zivzivadze's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.
The trade-off is real: poacher shows up as a structural caveat in the profile. Any club buying the upside has to decide whether that hole is tolerable in their system — or whether they will need complementary players beside him.
Why Ballity says this
- Midfield / role totality: poacher, shadow striker, target man
- Shown minutes: CF (#9)
- Known caveat: poacher
Receipts
- · Player Profile
- · Role Breadth
- · Deployment authenticity
- · Sample · featured
Position
Forward
Appearances
20
Great+ roles
1
Age
32
Preferred foot
Both
Height
189 cm
Ballity insights
Peer context vs forwards — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).
Usage rate
Share of team touches (non-GK) among forwards with match data.
8.8% team touches
Peer band · Average
Pool percentile
65.3%
Also 33.8 touches/90 (season aggregate).
Efficiency
Output quality per action for forwards.
56 score
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
81.0%
On-ball separation
Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.
34 score
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
79.0%
Off-ball separation
Movement-created space on assisted attempts.
70 score
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
73.0%
Balance & structural weaknesses
How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.
How we define this
Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.
Strong as Poacher (Great)
Weak routes
Stat profile
Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).
Versatility Index
Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.
Index
36.9
Breadth 23.5 · Depth 13.4
- ·Midfielders: Box Crasher (Elite), Carrier (Good)
- ·Forwards: Poacher (Great), Shadow Striker (Good), Target Man (Good)
Versatility shape
Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.
Specialist
Great SpecialistDistinct Great+
1 Great+ roles total
Where he plays
Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.
Natural
Role translations
Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.
Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.
Role-by-role detail
How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.
Similar players
Shape match across forward roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.
Michael Gregoritsch
FC Augsburg · Bundesliga
Closest roles
PoacherΔ1
Shadow StrikerΔ3
Target ManΔ16
Folarin Balogun
AS Monaco · Ligue 1
Closest roles
- PoacherΔ9
- Shadow StrikerΔ17
- Target ManΔ10
Lautaro Martínez
Inter · Serie A
Closest roles
- PoacherΔ13
- Shadow StrikerΔ14
- Target ManΔ15