Emanuele Valeri

Parma · Midfielder · Italy · 2,120 min

Ballity Verdict

What makes this player special?

Confidence · medium

Emanuele Valeri earns his standing through how he shapes phases of play for Parma — not through a single viral trait.

On the pitch he has actually been used as LW. That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Valeri's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.

There are no major weakness flags screaming from the current profile — which does not mean he is complete, only that the main story is the strength of what he already does.

Why Ballity says this

  • Shown minutes: LW
  • No major weakness flags in the current profile
Receipts
  • · Player Profile
  • · Role Breadth
  • · Deployment authenticity
  • · Sample · featured

Position

Winger

Appearances

25

Great+ roles

0

Age

27

Preferred foot

Left

Height

180 cm

Ballity insights

Peer context vs wingers — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).

Usage rate

Share of team touches (non-GK) among wingers with match data.

16.0% team touches

Peer band · Average

Pool percentile

60.2%

Also 50.1 touches/90 (season aggregate).

Efficiency

Output quality per action for wingers.

37 score

Peer band · Elite

Pool percentile

99.0%

xA per key pass 0.0911v1 win rate 83.3Cross accuracy 19.4

On-ball separation

Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.

34 score

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

16.3%

1v1 win % 83.3Adv touchline % 22.8Wide channel (self-created) % 9.5Unblocked (self-created) % 61.9Shadow zone (self-created) % 19Fast break (self-created) % 4.8Half-space % 9.3

Off-ball separation

Movement-created space on assisted attempts.

38 score

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

8.7%

Unblocked (assisted) % 33.3Shadow zone (assisted) % 33.3Arrival zone (assisted) % 33.3Wide channel (assisted) % 0xG per assisted shot 0.1

Balance & structural weaknesses

How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.

How we define this

Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.

No Great+ primaryWinger

No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.

Defensive contribution

Proxy only · confidence: proxynot a role tier

Clears

Proxy p91 · Actions p84 within winger peers

Stat profile

Within Winger peers — percentile shape (not role scores).

Ball Progressor 92Defending 58Creation 48
Creation48
Ball Progressor92
Carrying43
Finishing9
Defending58
Duels12
Tempo40
Box threat11

Versatility Index

Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.

1 group · 1 role
9/ 100

Index

8.8

Breadth 6.7 · Depth 2.1

FullbacksCentre-backsMidfieldersWingers · GoodForwards
  • ·Wingers: Playmaking Winger (Good)

Versatility shape

Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.

Unclassified

Unclassified

Unclassified
0

Distinct Great+

0 Great+ roles total

Where he plays

Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.

Natural

LWLWplaymaking_winger

Role translations

Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.

NaturalValidatedSupportedStrongPlausibleExploratory

Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.

Role-by-role detail

How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.

Similar players

Shape match across winger roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.

© 2026 Ballity · Player Profiling