Francesco Pio Esposito

Inter · Forward · Italy · 518 min

Ballity Verdict

What makes this player special?

Confidence · low

Francesco Pio Esposito's value is deciding games where it hurts: occupation of the box, finishing, and the pressure that comes with a centre-forward who stays dangerous. Build-up help is secondary; the point is goals and presence.

He is not trying to be everything. The profile is concentrated: do target man at a high level, and let secondary tasks stay secondary.

On the pitch he has actually been used as CF (#9) / SS. That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Esposito's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.

Sample size still limits how hard you can push the conclusions. The football idea is clear; the confidence should stay honest until a fuller season of minutes confirms it.

Why Ballity says this

  • Clearest current facet: target man (great)
  • Shown minutes: CF (#9) / SS
  • No major weakness flags in the current profile
Receipts
  • · Player Profile
  • · Role Breadth
  • · Deployment authenticity
  • · Sample · limited

Position

Forward

Appearances

9

Great+ roles

0

Age

21

Preferred foot

Right

Height

189 cm

Ballity insights

Peer context vs forwards — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).

Usage rate

Share of team touches (non-GK) among forwards with match data.

6.0% team touches

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

18.9%

Also 0.0 touches/90 (season aggregate).

Efficiency

Output quality per action for forwards.

50 score

Peer band · Average

Pool percentile

57.1%

xG per shot 0.167Goals / npxG 1Goals /90 0.35

On-ball separation

Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.

25 score

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

11.2%

Self-created shot share % 36Dribbles won/90 0Fast break (self-created) % 11.1

Off-ball separation

Movement-created space on assisted attempts.

77 score

Peer band · Elite

Pool percentile

98.2%

Unblocked (assisted) % 81.2Shadow zone (assisted) % 87.5Arrival zone (assisted) % 75Central channel (assisted) % 87.5xG per assisted shot 0.2

Balance & structural weaknesses

How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.

How we define this

Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.

No Great+ primaryStriker

No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.

Stat profile

Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).

Duels 78Box threat 63Creation 56
Creation56
Ball Progressor0
Carrying4
Finishing42
Defending52
Duels78
Tempo49
Box threat63

Versatility Index

Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.

2 groups · 4 roles
36/ 100

Index

35.8

Breadth 23.5 · Depth 12.4

FullbacksCentre-backsMidfielders · EliteWingersForwards · Great
  • ·Midfielders: Box Crasher (Elite), Creator (Great)
  • ·Forwards: Target Man (Great), Poacher (Good)

Versatility shape

Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.

Good

Specialist

Good Specialist
0

Distinct Great+

0 Great+ roles total

Where he plays

Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.

Natural

CFCFTarget Man
SSSSPoacher

Role translations

Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.

NaturalValidatedSupportedStrongPlausibleExploratory

Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.

Role-by-role detail

How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.

Similar players

Shape match across forward roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.

© 2026 Ballity · Player Profiling