Juventus · Forward · Canada · 1,795 min
Ballity Verdict
What makes this player special?
Jonathan David covers both boxes. He is not a specialist who only protects or only arrives late — he is the midfielder who can win it, carry it, and still show up in the final third. That two-way presence is what makes him hard to replace in Juventus's structure.
Beyond the headline job, David remains plausible as channel runner and target man. The secondary roles matter for how a coach can reorganise without changing the XI entirely.
On the pitch he has actually been used as CF (#9). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. David's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.
There are no major weakness flags screaming from the current profile — which does not mean he is complete, only that the main story is the strength of what he already does.
Why Ballity says this
Position
Forward
Appearances
35
Great+ roles
1
Age
26
Preferred foot
Both
Height
180 cm
Ballity insights
Peer context vs forwards — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).
Usage rate
Share of team touches (non-GK) among forwards with match data.
6.3% team touches
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
25.0%
Also 41.0 touches/90 (season aggregate).
Efficiency
Output quality per action for forwards.
53 score
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
80.5%
On-ball separation
Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.
29 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
38.1%
Off-ball separation
Movement-created space on assisted attempts.
57 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
29.7%
Balance & structural weaknesses
How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.
Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.
Strong as Poacher (Great) — complementary routes are not below Good, so no noticeable weakness flag.
Stat profile
Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).
Versatility Index
Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.
Index
40.0
Breadth 23.5 · Depth 16.5
Versatility shape
Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.
Specialist
Great SpecialistDistinct Great+
1 Great+ roles total
Where he plays
Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.
Natural
Role translations
Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.
Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.
Role-by-role detail
How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.
Similar players
Shape match across forward roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.
Anastasios Douvikas
Como · Serie A
Closest roles
Wesley Saïd
RC Lens · Ligue 1
Closest roles
Phil Harres
Holstein Kiel · Bundesliga 24/25
Closest roles