Justin Njinmah

SV Werder Bremen · Forward · Germany · 1,955 min

Ballity Verdict

What makes this player special?

Confidence · high

Justin Njinmah covers both boxes. He is not a specialist who only protects or only arrives late — he is the midfielder who can win it, carry it, and still show up in the final third. That two-way presence is what makes him hard to replace in SV Werder Bremen's structure.

Beyond the headline job, Njinmah remains plausible as wide runner. The secondary roles matter for how a coach can reorganise without changing the XI entirely.

On the pitch he has actually been used as RW / CF (#9). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Njinmah's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.

There are no major weakness flags screaming from the current profile — which does not mean he is complete, only that the main story is the strength of what he already does.

Why Ballity says this

  • Midfield / role totality: raumdeuter, wide runner
  • Shown minutes: RW / CF (#9)
  • No major weakness flags in the current profile
Receipts
  • · Player Profile
  • · Role Breadth
  • · Deployment authenticity
  • · Sample · featured

Position

Wide Forward

Appearances

33

Great+ roles

0

Age

25

Preferred foot

Right

Height

185 cm

Ballity insights

Peer context vs wingers — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).

Usage rate

Share of team touches (non-GK) among wingers with match data.

8.5% team touches

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

9.1%

Also 36.8 touches/90 (season aggregate).

Efficiency

Output quality per action for wingers.

31 score

Peer band · High

Pool percentile

82.4%

xA per key pass 0.0641v1 win rate 61.8Cross accuracy 25.7

On-ball separation

Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.

45 score

Peer band · Elite

Pool percentile

95.8%

1v1 win % 61.8Adv touchline % 26.6Wide channel (self-created) % 14.3Unblocked (self-created) % 75Shadow zone (self-created) % 67.9Fast break (self-created) % 64.3Half-space % 20.9

Off-ball separation

Movement-created space on assisted attempts.

48 score

Peer band · Average

Pool percentile

64.2%

Unblocked (assisted) % 76.5Shadow zone (assisted) % 50Arrival zone (assisted) % 38.2Wide channel (assisted) % 41.2xG per assisted shot 0.1

Balance & structural weaknesses

How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.

How we define this

Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.

No Great+ primaryWinger

No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.

Defensive contribution

Proxy only · confidence: proxynot a role tier

Does not clear

Proxy p46 · Actions p35 within winger peers

Stat profile

Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).

Defending 61Duels 61Tempo 50
Creation16
Ball Progressor3
Carrying45
Finishing26
Defending61
Duels61
Tempo50
Box threat50

Versatility Index

Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.

3 groups · 6 roles
38/ 100

Index

37.9

Breadth 23.5 · Depth 14.4

FullbacksCentre-backsMidfielders · GreatWingers · GoodForwards · Good
  • ·Midfielders: Box Crasher (Great), Carrier (Great)
  • ·Wingers: Raumdeuter (Good), Wide Runner (Good), Duelist Winger (Good)
  • ·Forwards: Channel Runner (Good)

Versatility shape

Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.

Good

Specialist

Good Specialist
0

Distinct Great+

0 Great+ roles total

Where he plays

Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.

Natural

CFCFTarget Man
RWRWRaumdeuter

Role translations

Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.

NaturalValidatedSupportedStrongPlausibleExploratory

Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.

Role-by-role detail

How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.

Similar players

Shape match across winger roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.

© 2026 Ballity · Player Profiling