Mandela Keita
Parma · Midfielder · Belgium · 2,999 min
Ballity Verdict
What makes this player special?
Mandela Keita covers both boxes. He is not a specialist who only protects or only arrives late — he is the midfielder who can win it, carry it, and still show up in the final third. That two-way presence is what makes him hard to replace in Parma's structure.
What separates Keita from ordinary specialists is breadth inside a coherent family: credible as carrier, and still trustworthy when asked to step toward ball winner. That is versatility with a purpose — not a random scatter of average roles.
On the pitch he has actually been used as CM (#8) / DM (#6). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Keita's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.
The trade-off is real: physicality shows up as a structural caveat in the profile. Any club buying the upside has to decide whether that hole is tolerable in their system — or whether they will need complementary players beside him.
Why Ballity says this
- Midfield / role totality: carrier, ball winner, duel destroyer
- Shown minutes: CM (#8) / DM (#6)
- Known caveat: physicality
Receipts
- · Player Profile
- · Role Breadth
- · Deployment authenticity
- · Sample · featured
Position
Midfielder
Appearances
37
Great+ roles
3
Age
24
Preferred foot
Right
Height
180 cm
Ballity insights
Peer context vs midfielders — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above.
Usage rate
Share of team touches (non-GK) among midfielders with match data.
11.1% team touches
Peer band · Minimal
Pool percentile
23.9%
Also 49.8 touches/90 (season aggregate).
Efficiency
Output quality per action for midfielders.
66 score
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
73.2%
Balance & structural weaknesses
How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.
How we define this
Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.
Strong as Physicality (Great)
Weak routes
Stat profile
Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).
Versatility Index
Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.
Index
38.9
Breadth 23.5 · Depth 15.5
- ·Fullbacks: Defensive FB (Great)
- ·Midfielders: Carrier (Elite), Ball Winner (Great), Duel Destroyer (Great), Deep-Lying Playmaker (Good)
Versatility shape
Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.
Dual-threat
Great Dual-threatDistinct Great+
3 Great+ roles total
Where he plays
Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.
Natural
Role translations
Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.
Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.
Role-by-role detail
How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.
Similar players
Shape match across midfielder roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.
Cheikh Niasse
Hellas Verona · Serie A
Closest roles
Duel DestroyerΔ27
CarrierΔ44
Box-to-BoxΔ7
Rodrigo Bentancur
Tottenham Hotspur · PL 25/26
Closest roles
- CarrierΔ0
- Duel DestroyerΔ1
Ball WinnerΔ1
Hugo Magnetti
Stade Brestois · Ligue 1
Closest roles
- Ball WinnerΔ1
- Duel DestroyerΔ9
- CarrierΔ17