Marcus Tavernier
Bournemouth · Midfielder · England · 1,507 min
Ballity Verdict
What makes this player special?
Marcus Tavernier is at his best when the game opens into one-versus-one battles out wide. For Bournemouth, that means stretch, isolation, and the ability to beat a full-back before the box gets crowded — not a pure chance-creation spreadsheet profile. The headline trait is playmaking winger.
He is not trying to be everything. The profile is concentrated: do playmaking winger at a high level, and let secondary tasks stay secondary.
On the pitch he has actually been used as LW / CF (#9). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Tavernier's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.
There are no major weakness flags screaming from the current profile — which does not mean he is complete, only that the main story is the strength of what he already does.
Why Ballity says this
- Clearest current facet: playmaking winger (good)
- Shown minutes: LW / CF (#9)
- No major weakness flags in the current profile
Receipts
- · Player Profile
- · Role Breadth
- · Deployment authenticity
- · Sample · featured
Position
Wide Forward
Appearances
16
Great+ roles
0
Age
27
Preferred foot
Left
Height
178 cm
Ballity insights
Peer context vs wingers — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).
Usage rate
Share of team touches (non-GK) among wingers with match data.
15.6% team touches
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
80.9%
Also 60.5 touches/90 (season aggregate).
Efficiency
Output quality per action for wingers.
22 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
26.4%
On-ball separation
Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.
35 score
Peer band · Minimal
Pool percentile
7.9%
Off-ball separation
Movement-created space on assisted attempts.
45 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
44.7%
Balance & structural weaknesses
How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.
How we define this
Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.
No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.
Defensive contribution
Proxy only · confidence: proxy — not a role tier
Proxy p72 · Actions p75 within winger peers
Stat profile
Within Winger peers — percentile shape (not role scores).
Versatility Index
Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.
Index
21.9
Breadth 16.8 · Depth 5.2
- ·Wingers: Playmaking Winger (Great)
- ·Forwards: Target Man (Good)
Versatility shape
Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.
Specialist
Good SpecialistDistinct Great+
0 Great+ roles total
Where he plays
Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.
Natural
Role translations
Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.
Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.
Role-by-role detail
How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.
Similar players
Shape match across winger roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.
Dejan Kulusevski
Tottenham Hotspur · PL 24/25
Closest roles
Playmaking WingerΔ8
Duelist WingerΔ13
RaumdeuterΔ10
Medon Berisha
Lecce · Serie A
Closest roles
- Playmaking WingerΔ1
- Duelist WingerΔ3
- RaumdeuterΔ1
Robert Skov
1. FC Union Berlin · Bundesliga 24/25
Closest roles
- Playmaking WingerΔ5
- Duelist WingerΔ2
- RaumdeuterΔ10