Marcus Thuram
Inter · Forward · France · 577 min
Ballity Verdict
What makes this player special?
Marcus Thuram's value is deciding games where it hurts: occupation of the box, finishing, and the pressure that comes with a centre-forward who stays dangerous. Build-up help is secondary; the point is goals and presence.
He is not trying to be everything. The profile is concentrated: do target man at a high level, and let secondary tasks stay secondary.
On the pitch he has actually been used as CF (#9) / SS. That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Thuram's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.
Sample size still limits how hard you can push the conclusions. The football idea is clear; the confidence should stay honest until a fuller season of minutes confirms it.
Why Ballity says this
- Clearest current facet: target man (great)
- Shown minutes: CF (#9) / SS
- No major weakness flags in the current profile
Receipts
- · Player Profile
- · Role Breadth
- · Deployment authenticity
- · Sample · limited
Position
Forward
Appearances
9
Great+ roles
0
Age
28
Preferred foot
Right
Height
192 cm
Ballity insights
Peer context vs forwards — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).
Usage rate
Share of team touches (non-GK) among forwards with match data.
7.2% team touches
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
40.2%
Also 0.0 touches/90 (season aggregate).
Efficiency
Output quality per action for forwards.
33 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
26.5%
On-ball separation
Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.
27 score
Peer band · Low
Pool percentile
32.4%
Off-ball separation
Movement-created space on assisted attempts.
47 score
Peer band · Minimal
Pool percentile
4.1%
Balance & structural weaknesses
How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.
How we define this
Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.
No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.
Stat profile
Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).
Versatility Index
Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.
Index
37.9
Breadth 23.5 · Depth 14.4
- ·Midfielders: Box Crasher (Elite), Creator (Great), Duel Destroyer (Good), Carrier (Good)
- ·Forwards: Target Man (Great)
Versatility shape
Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.
Specialist
Good SpecialistDistinct Great+
0 Great+ roles total
Where he plays
Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.
Natural
Role translations
Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.
Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.
Role-by-role detail
How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.
Similar players
Shape match across forward roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.
Sékou Mara
Auxerre · Ligue 1
Closest roles
Target ManΔ2
Shadow StrikerΔ10
Channel RunnerΔ4
Emiliano Buendía
Aston Villa · PL 25/26
Closest roles
- Target ManΔ42
- Shadow StrikerΔ11
- Channel RunnerΔ6
Kevin Carlos Omoruyi
Nice · Ligue 1
Closest roles
- Target ManΔ8
- Shadow StrikerΔ7
- Channel RunnerΔ16