Pedro Neto
Chelsea · Midfielder · Portugal · 1,543 min
Ballity Verdict
What makes this player special?
Pedro Neto is at his best when the game opens into one-versus-one battles out wide. For Chelsea, that means stretch, isolation, and the ability to beat a full-back before the box gets crowded — not a pure chance-creation spreadsheet profile. The headline trait is playmaking winger.
He is not trying to be everything. The profile is concentrated: do playmaking winger at a high level, and let secondary tasks stay secondary.
On the pitch he has actually been used as RW / CF (#9). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Neto's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.
The trade-off is real: creator shows up as a structural caveat in the profile. Any club buying the upside has to decide whether that hole is tolerable in their system — or whether they will need complementary players beside him.
Why Ballity says this
- Clearest current facet: playmaking winger (great)
- Shown minutes: RW / CF (#9)
- Known caveat: creator
Receipts
- · Player Profile
- · Role Breadth
- · Deployment authenticity
- · Sample · featured
Position
Wide Forward
Appearances
16
Great+ roles
1
Age
26
Preferred foot
Left
Height
172 cm
Ballity insights
Peer context vs wingers — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).
Usage rate
Share of team touches (non-GK) among wingers with match data.
9.7% team touches
Peer band · Minimal
Pool percentile
24.5%
Also 49.1 touches/90 (season aggregate).
Efficiency
Output quality per action for wingers.
29 score
Peer band · High
Pool percentile
77.3%
On-ball separation
Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.
39 score
Peer band · Average
Pool percentile
58.8%
Off-ball separation
Movement-created space on assisted attempts.
41 score
Peer band · Minimal
Pool percentile
9.6%
Balance & structural weaknesses
How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.
How we define this
Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.
Strong as Creator (Great)
Weak routes
Defensive contribution
Proxy only · confidence: proxy — not a role tier
Proxy p17 · Actions p19 within winger peers
Stat profile
Within Winger peers — percentile shape (not role scores).
Versatility Index
Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.
Index
13.1
Breadth 10.1 · Depth 3.1
- ·Wingers: Playmaking Winger (Great)
Versatility shape
Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.
Specialist
Great SpecialistDistinct Great+
1 Great+ roles total
Where he plays
Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.
Natural
Role translations
Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.
Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.
Role-by-role detail
How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.
Similar players
Shape match across winger roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.
Dwight McNeil
Everton · PL 24/25
Closest roles
Playmaking WingerΔ8
Duelist WingerΔ3
Wide RunnerΔ6
Franck Honorat
Borussia M'gladbach · Bundesliga
Closest roles
- Playmaking WingerΔ1
- Wide RunnerΔ1
- Duelist WingerΔ7
Charles De Ketelaere
Atalanta · Serie A
Closest roles
- Playmaking WingerΔ7
- Duelist WingerΔ9
- Wide RunnerΔ4