Piotr Zieliński

Inter · Midfielder · Poland · 834 min

Ballity Verdict

What makes this player special?

Confidence · low

Piotr Zieliński covers both boxes. He is not a specialist who only protects or only arrives late — he is the midfielder who can win it, carry it, and still show up in the final third. That two-way presence is what makes him hard to replace in Inter's structure.

Beyond the headline job, Zieliński remains plausible as box-to-box midfielder. The secondary roles matter for how a coach can reorganise without changing the XI entirely.

On the pitch he has actually been used as CM (#8) / AM (#10). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Zieliński's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.

Sample size still limits how hard you can push the conclusions. The football idea is clear; the confidence should stay honest until a fuller season of minutes confirms it.

Why Ballity says this

  • Midfield / role totality: box crasher, box-to-box midfielder
  • Shown minutes: CM (#8) / AM (#10)
  • No major weakness flags in the current profile
Receipts
  • · Player Profile
  • · Role Breadth
  • · Deployment authenticity
  • · Sample · limited

Position

Midfielder

Appearances

6

Great+ roles

0

Age

32

Preferred foot

Both

Height

180 cm

Ballity insights

Peer context vs midfielders — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above.

Usage rate

Share of team touches (non-GK) among midfielders with match data.

17.8% team touches

Peer band · Low

Pool percentile

33.7%

Also 76.2 touches/90 (season aggregate).

Efficiency

Output quality per action for midfielders.

68 score

Peer band · Elite

Pool percentile

95.4%

Press resistance 0.88Pass accuracy 92.5xA per key pass 0.072

Balance & structural weaknesses

How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.

How we define this

Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.

No Great+ primaryMidfielder

No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.

Stat profile

Within Midfielder peers — percentile shape (not role scores).

Box threat 93Carrying 92Finishing 92Press Resistant
Creation73
Ball Progressor64
Carrying92
Finishing92
Defending49
Duels45
Tempo88
Box threat93

Versatility Index

Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.

3 groups · 7 roles
48/ 100

Index

47.7

Breadth 30.2 · Depth 17.5

Fullbacks · EliteCentre-backsMidfielders · GreatWingersForwards · Good
  • ·Fullbacks: Playmaking FB (Elite)
  • ·Midfielders: Deep-Lying Playmaker (Great), Box Crasher (Good), Box-to-Box Midfielder (Good), Carrier (Good)
  • ·Forwards: Target Man (Good), Poacher (Good)

Versatility shape

Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.

Good

Specialist

Good Specialist
0

Distinct Great+

0 Great+ roles total

Where he plays

Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.

Natural

AMAMBox Crasher
CMCMBox Crasher

Role translations

Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.

NaturalValidatedSupportedStrongPlausibleExploratory

Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.

Role-by-role detail

How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.

Similar players

Shape match across midfielder roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.

© 2026 Ballity · Player Profiling