Tomáš Suslov

Hellas Verona · Midfielder · Slovakia · 1,862 min

Ballity Verdict

What makes this player special?

Confidence · high

Tomáš Suslov covers both boxes. He is not a specialist who only protects or only arrives late — he is the midfielder who can win it, carry it, and still show up in the final third. That two-way presence is what makes him hard to replace in Hellas Verona's structure.

Beyond the headline job, Suslov remains plausible as carrier. The secondary roles matter for how a coach can reorganise without changing the XI entirely.

On the pitch he has actually been used as CM (#8) / DM (#6). That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Suslov's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.

The trade-off is real: physicality shows up as a structural caveat in the profile. Any club buying the upside has to decide whether that hole is tolerable in their system — or whether they will need complementary players beside him.

Why Ballity says this

  • Midfield / role totality: duel destroyer, carrier
  • Shown minutes: CM (#8) / DM (#6)
  • Known caveat: physicality
Receipts
  • · Player Profile
  • · Role Breadth
  • · Deployment authenticity
  • · Sample · featured

Position

Midfielder

Appearances

23

Great+ roles

1

Age

24

Preferred foot

Left

Height

175 cm

Ballity insights

Peer context vs midfielders — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above.

Usage rate

Share of team touches (non-GK) among midfielders with match data.

26.3% team touches

Peer band · Elite

Pool percentile

89.4%

Also 40.5 touches/90 (season aggregate).

Efficiency

Output quality per action for midfielders.

57 score

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

6.5%

Press resistance 0.72Pass accuracy 77.7xA per key pass 0.062

Balance & structural weaknesses

How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.

How we define this

Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.

One-wayMidfielder

Strong as Physicality (Great)

Weak routes

Ball ProgressorChance Creation

Stat profile

Within Midfielder peers — percentile shape (not role scores).

Duels 86Creation 66Box threat 55
Creation66
Ball Progressor51
Carrying5
Finishing2
Defending46
Duels86
Tempo1
Box threat55

Versatility Index

Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.

2 groups · 4 roles
31/ 100

Index

31.4

Breadth 20.1 · Depth 11.3

Fullbacks · GoodCentre-backsMidfielders · EliteWingersForwards
  • ·Fullbacks: Overlapping FB (Good)
  • ·Midfielders: Deep-Lying Playmaker (Elite), Duel Destroyer (Great), Carrier (Good)

Versatility shape

Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.

Great

Specialist

Great Specialist
1

Distinct Great+

1 Great+ roles total

Where he plays

Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.

Natural

CMCMDuel Destroyer
DMDMDuel Destroyer

Role translations

Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.

NaturalValidatedSupportedStrongPlausibleExploratory

Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.

Role-by-role detail

How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.

Similar players

Shape match across midfielder roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.

© 2026 Ballity · Player Profiling