← Team Profiles

Liverpool · PL 25/26 · Champions League — pick a competition below (same club, separate player pools)

UEFA Champions League 25/26

Liverpool

4-2-3-1First-choice XI · 41 starts

Default view is a per-slot first-choice selection in the season’s most-used formation. Swaps recompute personnel and Synergy — style metrics stay on season aggregates.

Interactive pitch

Hover a player for details. Use Side bias or Squad profiles to read the XI. Select bench → slot to swap.

Bench

Team Synergy

Team strength and Synergy (synergy-v3) for this XI. Both update on pitch swaps.

Team strength

95.2

Mean primary-role quality of this XI

Synergy

87.4

Capability identity 94.5 · complete 96.1

Identity

Vertical / Transition

Confidence 75%

Strongest capability

100.0

Deep Progression

Biggest gap

0.0

Tempo Control · score 0 / target 58

This squad is exceptionally suited to vertical / transition football because it combines Elite primary goalscoring, Elite ball carrying, Elite through-ball threat. Main limitations: Below-minimum tempo control; Average defensive transition; Average recovery pace.

  • · Overlap Support depends heavily on one player (Miloš Kerkez).
  • · Defensive Transition depends heavily on one player (Miloš Kerkez).

Personnel (live)

Recomputed from current XI selection — role tiers are fixed inputs, not re-derived.

Progression hub

Florian Wirtz

Great Box Crasher

Primary creator

Mohamed Salah

Great Playmaking Winger

Updated by swap

Primary threat

Hugo Ekitiké

Great Poacher

Side bias (current XI)

+1.6%

RHS lean

No structural gaps in current XI.

Style (season — fixed)

UEFA Champions League 25/26 · Season aggregates vs the rest of this competition. Click a shot zone to light it on the pitch.

Team identity

League-percentile style fingerprint for Liverpool — shape of play, not overall strength. Outer edge = top of the competition on that axis.

POSSCREATESPTRANSDIRBOXPRESS
  • Possession

    Ball possession vs league

    P72

    12/40

  • Assisted creation

    Share of shots after a teammate pass/cross

    P23

    31/40

  • Set pieces

    Shots from corners / FKs / throw-in SP

    P69

    13/40

  • Transitions

    Fast-break shot share

    P90

    5/40

  • Directness

    Accurate long balls / passes

    P74

    11/40

  • Box threat

    In-box shot share (six-yard + box)

    P69

    13/40

  • Press proxy

    Defensive actions per opp possession

    P67

    14/40

Dashed ring = league median (P50)

Attack shape

Attack →

Shots from the six-yard + penalty box (close-range volume).

Mean xG / shot

Set-piece goals 37.5% of goals

4 of 40 · P0 · league med 0

How chances are created

Share of season shots by situation — not a quality score.

Assisted47.1%(107)
Corner19.8%(45)
Self-created13.7%(31)
Fast break11.0%(25)
Set piece3.5%(8)
Free kick3.1%(7)
Penalty0.9%(2)
Throw-in SP0.9%(2)

Assisted shot %

% of shots after a teammate pass/cross

47.1%

31 of 40 · P23 · league med 51.2

Set-piece shot %

Corners, FKs, throw-in SP, set pieces

27.3%

13 of 40 · P69 · league med 25.5

Fast-break shot %

Share of shots from transitions

5 of 40 · P90 · league med 8.4

On the ball

Possession

Avg ball possession

52.8%

12 of 40 · P72 · league med 50

Long-ball rate

Accurate long balls / passes

11 of 40 · P74 · league med 7.9

Final-third entries

Final-third entries / passes

4 of 40 · P0 · league med 0

Side bias

Distance-weighted heatmap lean (+RHS / −LHS)

-4.6

26 of 40 · P36 · league med -2.2

Without the ball

Defensive actions / opp poss

Recoveries + tackles + ints ÷ opp possession

150.6

medium confidence — proxy, not PPDA

14 of 40 · P67 · league med 147.2

Clearances / match

Team clearances per game

37 of 40 · P100 · league med 0

Opp touches in box

Opponent penalty-area touches / match

37 of 40 · P100 · league med 0

Duel win %

Overall duel win rate

4 of 40 · P0 · league med 0

Cross-layer insights (interpretive)

Anchored to season side bias — not updated by pitch swaps.

left flankbalancedJeremie Frimpong

Team side bias near central (-4.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.

Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.

right flankbalancedMiloš Kerkez

Team side bias near central (-4.6); flank fit is not strongly directional.

Heuristic classification — validate against match film for high-stakes use.

© 2026 Ballity · Player Profiling