Che Adams

Torino · Forward · Scotland · 1,896 min

Ballity Verdict

What makes this player special?

Confidence · medium

Che Adams earns his standing through how he shapes phases of play for Torino — not through a single viral trait.

On the pitch he has actually been used as CF (#9) / SS. That matters: skill-set breadth is one thing; demonstrated deployment is another. Adams's authenticity claim starts from those minutes, not from a role board alone.

There are no major weakness flags screaming from the current profile — which does not mean he is complete, only that the main story is the strength of what he already does.

Why Ballity says this

Shown minutes: CF (#9) / SS
No major weakness flags in the current profile

Receipts

· Player Profile
· Role Breadth
· Deployment authenticity
· Sample · featured

Position

Forward

Appearances

Great+ roles

Age

Preferred foot

Right

Height

175 cm

Ballity insights

Peer context vs forwards — how often they get the ball and what they do with it. Separate from role tiers above. Attackers also split separation into on-ball (dribble-created) and off-ball (movement).

Usage rate

Share of team touches (non-GK) among forwards with match data.

10.0% team touches

Peer band · High

Pool percentile

77.0%

Also 37.8 touches/90 (season aggregate).

Efficiency

Output quality per action for forwards.

39 score

Peer band · Low

Pool percentile

31.4%

xG per shot 0.111Goals / npxG 1Goals /90 0.28

On-ball separation

Dribble-created space and self-made shot quality.

35 score

Peer band · High

Pool percentile

83.9%

1v1 win % 43.3Self-created shot share % 50.9Dribbles won/90 0.6Fast break (self-created) % 33.3

Off-ball separation

Movement-created space on assisted attempts.

53 score

Peer band · Minimal

Pool percentile

14.4%

Unblocked (assisted) % 57.7Shadow zone (assisted) % 57.7Arrival zone (assisted) % 38.5Central channel (assisted) % 34.6xG per assisted shot 0.1

Balance & structural weaknesses

How complete this player is on the position's job board — strengths and holes.

How we define this

Two-way = Great+ on ≥2 complementary axes. One-way = every other route Limited/closed. Weak routes = Average holes on complementary axes.

No Great+ primaryStriker

No Elite/Great axis on this position's job board, so no weakness flag.

Stat profile

Within position peers — percentile shape (not role scores).

Defending 57Duels 57Tempo 52

Creation28

Ball Progressor28

Carrying46

Finishing28

Defending57

Duels57

Tempo52

Box threat52

Versatility Index

Precise 0–100 score — cross-group breadth (67%) plus within-group depth (33%), quality-scaled by tier. Distinct from the shape card below.

2 groups · 3 roles

29/ 100

Index

29.4

Breadth 20.1 · Depth 9.3

FullbacksCentre-backsMidfielders · EliteWingersForwards · Good

·Midfielders: Box Crasher (Elite), Creator (Great)
·Forwards: Poacher (Good)

Versatility shape

Coarse directional pattern (Specialist / Dual-threat / Generalist) — not the 0–100 Index above.

Unclassified

Distinct Great+

0 Great+ roles total

Where he plays

Positions with deployment evidence — not statistical guesses.

Natural

CFCFPoacher

SSSSPoacher

Role translations

Where the profile could fit. Tap a position — then see which role style suits it.

NaturalValidatedSupportedStrongPlausibleExploratory

Select a position on the pitch to see the best role, alternatives, and evidence.

Role-by-role detail

How each role is scored. Expand a row for a radar of role-shaped stats.

Similar players

Shape match across forward roles — cosine similarity of role scores (domestic leagues only). Slot 1 is the best same-league match; the rest are the next closest from the full pool.

Anastasios Douvikas

Como · Serie A

99.4% matchSame league

Closest roles

PoacherΔ49
Channel RunnerΔ54
Target ManΔ47

Phil Harres

Holstein Kiel · Bundesliga 24/25

99.4% match

Closest roles

PoacherΔ35
Channel RunnerΔ31
Target ManΔ34

Jonathan David

Juventus · Serie A

99.0% match

Closest roles

Channel RunnerΔ29
PoacherΔ44
Target ManΔ33